Your message dated Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:44:24 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [Pkg-jed-sl-modules] Bug#383779: FTBFS on amd64: not creating
PIC code?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: slang-slirp
Version: 1.9.0-1-1
Severity: serious
slang-slirp doesn't build on amd64, probably because you're not
building PIC code (see policy for more information on this requirement).
| Testing examples/vec ...
| /usr/bin/ld: fvec.o: relocation R_X86_64_32S against `a local symbol'
| can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
| fvec.o: could not read symbols: Bad value
| collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=slang-slirp&ver=1.9.0-1-1&arch=amd64&stamp=1155677704&file=log&as=raw
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.9.0.2-1
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 03:51:46PM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> Indeed. I thought that #383777 and #383779 were related to each other
> and closed both of them in slang-slirp_1.9.0-1-2. I will investigate the
> problem.
slang-slirp has built fine on amd64 (and alpha, and ia64) since 1.9.0.2-1, but
without any entry in the changelog; I'm marking it as properly closed in that
version now.
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
--- End Message ---
