Your message dated Mon, 2 Oct 2006 10:01:52 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#390579: udev: lo (loopback) interface not UP nor RUNNING
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: udev
Version: 0.100-2
Severity: important
The "lo" loopback network interface does not come up when I boot. The
eth0 and eth1 interfaces come up correctly. I have purged hotplug.
# ifconfig lo
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
LOOPBACK MTU:16436 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)
# ifup lo
# ifconfig lo
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)
My /etc/network/interfaces contains
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
allow-hotplug eth1
iface eth1 inet static
address kooka-shark
broadcast broadcast-shark
netmask 255.255.255.0
down ifconfig $IFACE 0.0.0.0 down
up /usr/sbin/dhcpd3 -q $IFACE
down test -f /var/run/dhcpd.pid && kill `cat /var/run/dhcpd.pid`
allow-hotplug eth0
iface eth0 inet dhcp
pre-up rm -f /var/lib/dhcp3/dhclient.leases
pre-up /etc/local/firewall --log daemon.alert $IFACE
post-down /etc/local/firewall --log daemon.alert --down $IFACE
down ifconfig $IFACE 0.0.0.0 down
My /etc/udev/rules.d/z25_persistent-net.rules contains
SUBSYSTEM=="net", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTRS{address}=="00:09:5b:22:f2:43",
NAME="eth0"
SUBSYSTEM=="net", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTRS{address}=="00:40:05:e2:ea:e9",
NAME="eth1"
Does anybody know why I don't have a lo network interface?
thanks
Stuart
-- Package-specific info:
-- /etc/udev/rules.d/:
/etc/udev/rules.d/:
total 8
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 2006-09-10 17:38 020_permissions.rules ->
../permissions.rules
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 2005-10-14 11:25 025_libgphoto2.rules ->
../libgphoto2.rules
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 2006-08-05 10:07 025_libsane.rules ->
../libsane.rules
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 2006-09-10 17:38 udev.rules -> ../udev.rules
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 25 2006-09-10 17:38 z20_persistent-input.rules ->
../persistent-input.rules
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 2006-09-10 17:38 z20_persistent.rules ->
../persistent.rules
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2144 2006-09-25 23:29 z25_persistent-cd.rules
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 544 2006-10-01 22:34 z25_persistent-net.rules
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 33 2006-09-10 17:38 z45_persistent-net-generator.rules
-> ../persistent-net-generator.rules
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 2006-09-10 17:38 z50_run.rules -> ../run.rules
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 2006-09-10 17:38 z55_hotplug.rules ->
../hotplug.rules
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 2005-08-03 21:32 z60_alsa-utils.rules ->
../alsa-utils.rules
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 2005-09-22 23:17 z60_hdparm.rules -> ../hdparm.rules
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 29 2006-09-10 17:38 z75_cd-aliases-generator.rules ->
../cd-aliases-generator.rules
-- /sys/:
/sys/block/dm-0/dev
/sys/block/dm-1/dev
/sys/block/dm-2/dev
/sys/block/dm-3/dev
/sys/block/fd0/dev
/sys/block/hda/dev
/sys/block/hda/hda1/dev
/sys/block/hda/hda2/dev
/sys/block/hda/hda3/dev
/sys/block/hdc/dev
/sys/block/hdd/dev
/sys/block/hde/dev
/sys/block/hde/hde1/dev
/sys/block/hde/hde3/dev
/sys/block/hde/hde4/dev
/sys/block/hdf/dev
/sys/block/hdf/hdf1/dev
/sys/block/hdf/hdf2/dev
/sys/block/hdf/hdf3/dev
/sys/block/hdg/dev
/sys/block/hdg/hdg1/dev
/sys/block/ram0/dev
/sys/block/ram1/dev
/sys/block/ram10/dev
/sys/block/ram11/dev
/sys/block/ram12/dev
/sys/block/ram13/dev
/sys/block/ram14/dev
/sys/block/ram15/dev
/sys/block/ram2/dev
/sys/block/ram3/dev
/sys/block/ram4/dev
/sys/block/ram5/dev
/sys/block/ram6/dev
/sys/block/ram7/dev
/sys/block/ram8/dev
/sys/block/ram9/dev
/sys/class/drm/card0/dev
/sys/class/input/input0/event0/dev
/sys/class/input/input1/event1/dev
/sys/class/input/input2/event2/dev
/sys/class/input/input2/mouse0/dev
/sys/class/input/input2/ts0/dev
/sys/class/input/mice/dev
/sys/class/misc/agpgart/dev
/sys/class/misc/device-mapper/dev
/sys/class/misc/hpet/dev
/sys/class/misc/psaux/dev
/sys/class/misc/rtc/dev
/sys/class/misc/snapshot/dev
/sys/class/sound/controlC0/dev
/sys/class/sound/controlC1/dev
/sys/class/sound/hwC1D0/dev
/sys/class/sound/mixer/dev
/sys/class/sound/mixer1/dev
/sys/class/sound/pcmC0D0p/dev
/sys/class/sound/pcmC1D0c/dev
/sys/class/sound/pcmC1D0p/dev
/sys/class/sound/timer/dev
/sys/class/usb_device/usbdev1.1/dev
/sys/class/usb_device/usbdev1.2/dev
/sys/class/usb_device/usbdev2.1/dev
/sys/class/usb_device/usbdev3.1/dev
/sys/class/usb_device/usbdev4.1/dev
/sys/class/usb_device/usbdev4.4/dev
/sys/class/usb_device/usbdev4.5/dev
/sys/class/usb_device/usbdev4.6/dev
/sys/class/usb_device/usbdev5.1/dev
/sys/class/usb_device/usbdev5.2/dev
/sys/class/usb_device/usbdev5.3/dev
/sys/class/usb_device/usbdev5.5/dev
/sys/class/usb_device/usbdev5.6/dev
/sys/class/usb_device/usbdev5.7/dev
-- Kernel configuration:
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages udev depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.6.ds1-4 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libselinux1 1.30.28-2 SELinux shared libraries
ii libvolume-id0 0.100-2 libvolume_id shared library
ii lsb-base 3.1-17 Linux Standard Base 3.1 init scrip
udev recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Oct 02, Stuart Pook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I cannot imagine who removed /etc/rc?.d/*networking. It happened about
A broken version of update-rc.d.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
