Your message dated Tue, 3 Oct 2006 16:03:13 +0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#302802: locally solved by upgrading to latest 3.2 package
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: request-tracker3.4
Severity: normal
info for rt3.4 claims:
This is the 3.4 series of RT, it can be installed alongside the 3.0
and 3.2 series without any problems.
Trying to install re3.4 results in:
Running: apt-get install 'request-tracker3.4'
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following packages will be REMOVED:
request-tracker3.2
The following NEW packages will be installed:
request-tracker3.4
The following held packages will be changed:
request-tracker3.2
0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 1 to remove and 1 not upgraded.
Need to get 1066kB of archives.
After unpacking 262kB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n]
Please note that I have set rt3.2 on "hold" due to some local
customizations I don't want to loose.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 09:03:13AM +0100, Stephen Quinney wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 07:04:01PM -0800, Norbert Kiesel wrote:
> > Looking at info of rt3.4 I saw it conflicts with earlier rt3.2 packages.
> > I ended up upgrading to the latest 3.2 and reapplying my changes, which
> > allowed me to install rt3.4.
> >
> > Still not sure why this conflict exists.
> >
>
> The request-tracker3.4 package conflicts with earlier versions of
> request-tracker3.2 because both packages wanted to install the same
> file (and that is definitely a bad thing). This was due to an
> oversight on my part and is now fixed via the normal alternatives
> handling system that is used in all my RT packages. The only way to
> prevent bad things happening on install of the request-tracker3.4
> package was to declare a conflict on request-tracker3.2 versions less
> than 3.2.2-3.
Hi,
as request-tracker3.2 is long gone from the archive, I'm closing this bug.
Cheers,
--
Niko Tyni [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- End Message ---