Your message dated Thu, 19 Oct 2006 10:15:36 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.44
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
also sprach Jamie L. Penman-Smithson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.07.02.0012
+0200]:
> >As far as I can tell, Postfix adds extended status codes, so instead
> >of "250", you now get "250 2.0.0".
>
> Most of the rules have been updated to include these. If you find any
> which have not been, file a bug.
Patch attached. I tried my best to stay backwards-compatible.
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
"work consists of whatever a body is obliged to do.
play consists of whatever a body is not obliged to do."
-- mark twain
BZh91AY&SY%�J �߀ 0d����������`_ � q�&�CM[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ɏ2dшi����4ɈMi�1�L�1
40CF�1# �M0�&�(z�M��� dɣ�C414i�20�4�2`�$ � ��
&��iG��5OmML�S�'�M=6��a
��U�MLn����<'c7��o0O�5��c�UUU|�x�̘h��+�T&3��/iAJA�����Ɍ��8l��]�IO"[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
{�IM[�3nŚ�\�չ]7^�Y]�YlV�z�L��U9�}�)�S �B��N��KGB��f��=jMNgQ����&�[
!��,��#��̭J~�$d$�9��;`5wCc9���w\,[EMAIL
PROTECTED]/l��zΕ$�DƤW�ds�$`R�$��[\��赭��wvG��UK��w������$^MD��'��ì��¤��:gا��9O;[�����x��*I>�����w%ENŔ��G��������w
�a�T���dM/}�%�iV#N�^�I�ν��/a�%ʹ�N�+)��ִ�Dy-.�U�"���L�Pj�G����k���-!9!=5Ic��jm�R{�JBP�����!w�m�J�j�t�3%.hR��kIHl��S�6�����~��ED��������,����
�x?3����bƯ�~É=�o�2,IVR�hgw���8�ı�0�{�R
��K���N�釲�%����X����"�
�!.#舡)�����R���"���'��^k>�[�Sa���SՊ�IL����&\�QJP7����?Z�:ieK �Z�V��e
B�UUH�X�E-,�K ����]�$K:9
��E��ZU�)*�/�G��6�Uz�}�E����)*�i��:R�Jc�SC����T��=��zU7�ٌŢ�W�I�kK�A{����Я��������&��5mn�Zzd��s�
�Z�T�ґJ��Y,���M0.��^����)F%�,ո���ؗL�y�>^�뱻��*R�-R���0!2O�_ݡ�K-;_З�63*�sS�%b���z���&ť�(�������إ1,؎L�Ά�V�G������;3��[L�6�˛�"�c�^�Ss`�q�i�!RG�����S�P۠�h�(>K\��ܥ�����,��l.NI̜���\�3���$�i{\��5��o3������`�Ȇ.j�h���rjYc�g��'*�����ɡ�HK!��hi*y�ihS��<��Y�s��/��Ĕ�o����d�&�D�niS�ZE�T��:��3K��IY.�kF2bk�œ��S�Q�+L�&Y�!0a�����q
IB�F�4�i���7���G���W5�5���65��n�#�Q�������9�9�؎b�IMdZ�7k��d�瀋+��*ST�TG����
V�Z���d�bf��L�5L�]�(���*f���T���n�\��oJs-<���6�%ܤ�H����N��¶��3gtH͜���,�-}E˩��2�����i�N6�B�.�83qM�������(��76�$��v�5&�v�&F��H���:������)��M(����!��3��y)�ә��������g�yh�ο{�b��H>=�Z{S��b�H�
��C
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.2.47
I believe this to be fixed.
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)
--- End Message ---