Your message dated Sat, 21 Oct 2006 21:38:23 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixing version-tracking for already fixed-in-NMU bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: bnetd
Version: 0.4.19-1.2
Severity: Serious
Justification: Policy 11.7
bnetd contains files in /etc that are not marked as conffiles.
This violates a must in Debian Policy, so is a Serious bug.
This is a mass bug submission, and has been discussed on debian-devel
starting at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2002/debian-devel-200201/msg02546.html
For details of which files in bnetd are not marked as conffiles see
http://lintian.debian.org/reports/Tfile-in-etc-not-marked-as-conffile.html
If your maintainer scripts modify these files, they must not be shipped
in the package.
If your maintainer scripts do not modify these files then they must be marked
as conffiles.
Example configuration files should be placed in
/usr/share/doc/bnetd/examples
See Debian Policy 11.7 for more information.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.4.19-1.3
This bug was fixed in an NMU, but never closed. I'm closing it with the
correct version so that its status can be properly version-tracked.
For reference:
bnetd (0.4.19-1.3) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Non-maintainer upload.
* Mark /etc/bnetd/{bnetd.reg,news.txt} as conffiles (closes: #132155).
Regards,
Adam
--- End Message ---
