Your message dated Sun, 22 Oct 2006 11:02:21 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line (no subject)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: gs-common
Version: 0.3.3.1
Severity: normal
I just upgraded a system, which involved a gs-common 0.3.3.1 -> 0.3.6
upgrade. It failed with:
Preparing to replace gs-common 0.3.3.1 (using .../gs-common_0.3.6_all.deb) ...
Cleaning up font configuration of gs...
[...]
Unpacking replacement gs-common ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/gs-common_0.3.6_all.deb
(--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/de/man1/gsnd.1.gz', which is also in
package gs
dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe)
Preparing to replace gs 7.05-1 (using .../apt/archives/gs_8.01-5_all.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement gs ...
Selecting previously deselected package gs-gpl.
Unpacking gs-gpl (from .../gs-gpl_8.01-5_i386.deb) ...
A subsequent dist-upgrade succeeds (I guess since gs is upgraded by then).
Cheers,
Daniel
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (400, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.19-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages gs-common depends on:
ii debconf 1.2.21 Debian configuration management sy
ii debianutils 1.16.7 Miscellaneous utilities specific t
pn defoma Not found.
ii gs 7.05-1 The Ghostscript Postscript interpr
pn gsfonts Not found.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
I couldn't reproduce this bug, and gs-common has been conflicting (and
replacing) with gs << 6.51, which was the last version including
manpages in it. So, it shouldn't have happend. I don't know why, but
I guess I can suppose this bug has gone anway.
--
Masayuki Hatta
Graduate School of Economics, The University of Tokyo
--- End Message ---
