Your message dated Tue, 24 Oct 2006 13:36:28 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#394918: why not merge in with tail?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: inotail
Version: 0.1-1
Severity: wishlist
Reading the package description and upstream's home page, it seems that
this really should be merged into coreutils' tail.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-1-686
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Tags: +wontfix
thanks
On 2006-10-23 at 22:28:59 +0200, Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: inotail
> Version: 0.1-1
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Reading the package description and upstream's home page, it seems that
> this really should be merged into coreutils' tail.
I don't think that'll make a lot of sense as inotify is not available on
every platform coreutils supports. Also inotail currently is not in a
state where I consider it a full tail replacement (e.g. it doesn't
support -n +<num> correctly).
Closing this bug therefor.
Thanks, Tobias
--- End Message ---
