Your message dated Wed, 25 Oct 2006 10:48:35 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#381208: marked as done (RM: mozilla-thunderbird-locale-uk
-- RoM; abandoned upstream; uninstallable)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Please remove mozilla-thunderbird-locale-uk, it is not installable in unstable
and it is not going to be updated by upstream.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-rc2-me
Locale: LANG=uk_UA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=uk_UA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 09:39:18AM +0300, Borys Yanovych wrote:
> Original bug report message:
>
> Eugeniy Meshcheryakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> "Please remove mozilla-thunderbird-locale-uk, it is not installable in
> unstable and it is not going to be updated by upstream."
>
>
> Package icedove-locale-uk is the renewed renamed version of package
> mozilla-thunderbird-locale-uk. Now mozilla-thunderbird-locale-uk is an
> empty transitional package for properly thunderbird (and
> mozilla-thunderbird) rename. So, it _must_ be renewed in archive.
Ah, I missed the fact that you added an empty transitional package. That
was not mentioned in the changelog (you could have added a line "Add
empty transitional package for moz-thu-locale-uk (Closes:
#removal-bug)")
The source package still needs removal, but this will now happen
semi-automagically because all binary packages are superseded.
I assume this practice of adding transitional packages is done for all
translations, for consistency's sake?
Closing the bug again now,
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
--- End Message ---
