Your message dated Tue, 31 Oct 2006 12:01:07 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#396262: yelp: new upstream available 2.16.1 2006-10-02
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: vte
Version: 1:0.12.2-4
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/sources/vte/0.14
new upstream 0.14.1 2006-10-02 available
sid has 0.12.2 and experimental has 0.14.
thx.
Noèl
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-1-686
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
> latest upstream version of yelp is 2.16.1 from 2006-10-02.
Please stop filing these bugs, it's a waste of time for you and me.
We know when upstream releases are made, we don't need to have bug
reminders, or to have to close bugs each time additionally yo all the
work already involved. If we're not uploading them, it's because it's
not the priority, and takes time from other things, just as these bugs
do.
When you first filed a wishlist item of this type, I thought you were
needing a new upstream release for a particular reason, perhaps a very
annoying bug, so I uploaded it because I thought you were in a real
need for it.
We know about new upstream releases because we're subscribed to the
upstream release list, and there are always the PTS, and this page in
case we need a resync:
http://www.0d.be/debian/debian-gnome-2.16-status.html
(I'm closing these bugs.)
Thanks for considering,
--
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- End Message ---
