Your message dated Sun, 5 Nov 2006 14:22:00 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#395134: please bring back slatec
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: slatec
Version: 4.1
Severity: wishlist
the slatec package is very useful for the research i am doing. i am
dissappointed to find out that it has been removed from the archive.
reading the other bugs, it looks like this was removed because the
maintainer did not keep his changes separate from the upstream version.
if i were to help update the package to have an orig and a diff, would
it be possible to bring slatec back? or is there a licensing issue here
that isn't apparent?
thanks.
mike
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (600, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-1-686
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Michael,
On 10/25/06, Michael Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
the slatec package is very useful for the research i am doing. i am
dissappointed to find out that it has been removed from the archive.
sorry for removing the package, but without a maintainer there is no
way to keep it. You can file RFP bug against the wnpp pseudo package
or you can try to find a new maintainer. Now I am closing this bug
report.
Regards,
Torsten
--
blog: http://twerner.blogspot.com/
homepage: http://www.twerner42.de/
--- End Message ---
