On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 11:33:30PM +0200, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: > Hi Reiner, > > On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 11:10:25PM +0200, Reiner Herrmann wrote: > > Hi Chris, > > > > On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 11:04:00PM +0200, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 12:11:09AM +0000, Santiago Vila wrote: > > > > Package: src:lua-lgi > > > > > thanks for bisecting. > > But it seems to be inaccurate. We already found out (in the linked upstream > > bug tracker) that pango 1.56.2 causes the regression. > > Yeah, you're right. My earlier bisect failed due to unrelated > reasons. The real result is: > > bisection finished successfully > last good timestamp: 20250313T150353Z > first bad timestamp: 20250313T210003Z > the following packages differ between the last good and first bad timestamp: > gir1.2-pango-1.0:arm64 1.56.1-1 -> 1.56.2-1 > libcairo-gobject2:arm64 1.18.2-2 -> 1.18.4-1 > libcairo-script-interpreter2:arm64 1.18.2-2 -> 1.18.4-1 > libcairo2-dev:arm64 1.18.2-2 -> 1.18.4-1 > libcairo2:arm64 1.18.2-2 -> 1.18.4-1 > libcap2:arm64 1:2.75-1 -> 1:2.75-2 > libpango-1.0-0:arm64 1.56.1-1 -> 1.56.2-1
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/pango/-/merge_requests/829 looks like the "smoking gun". Especially the change in fwupd looks relevant: https://github.com/fwupd/fwupd/issues/8587 https://github.com/fwupd/fwupd/commit/d0d3eff666d2a6d9c09346ea050eed1c78271f0a Chris
