In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Agustin Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I meant with oe-1char oe as a single char (U+0153), available > in iso-8859-15 (octal \275 here), but not in iso-8859-1 (you > have one half instead), and with oe-2char the two 7bit chars sequence > 'oe', available anywhere, and that is the trick usually used in > iso-8859-1 to represent that char.
Ah, I see. > I like the idea, and at a first glance it should not be difficult to > implement, even for a person like me, whose lisp skills are limited. It will > help for old emacs21, for emacs20 my workaround will do nothing since it has > no iso-8859-15, and for Debian xemacs21 my workaround is also doing nothing > since xemacs21 seems to return some extra (IMHO wrong) stuff in > buffer-file-coding-system. > I will first retest everything with a 'good' (built to my taste) french > dict, pen and paper, to know in detail the differences in the results for > both systems. Last day I could notice that the misalignment error > disappeared and that things worked better, but not much more. Need to test > also with aspell and other languages. > Even in the case both systems give mostly similar results I will try > integrating them, since I guess your patch will be more appropriate for > future emacs21 development, and looks somewhat more general. How are ispell.el of Emacs and that of dictionaries-common maintained? Are they synched somehow? Should I install my patch for CVS Emacs. Or, is it better to wait for you or some other maintainer work on it? --- Ken'ichi HANDA [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
