reassign 290531 cvs
thanks
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 18:31:50 +0100, Frank K�ster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> This might be in fact a bug in CVS, hence the copy to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Indeed.
> When I use the cvs-buildpackage and the CVS commands proposed by it
> to import a new upstream version in the vendor branch, and then to
> merge the upstream changes not to the trunk, but only to the
> experimental branch, some of the new files end up in HEAD
> nevertheless.
From what you said, the only cvs-buildpackage command
you had was cvs-update, which is a glorified way of saying
cvs import -m'blah' tetex-base source-dist some-tag-that-we-use
If CVS is not doing what you think it should,m then CVS needs
to address that.
manoj
--
There is no grief which time does not lessen and soften.
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
