Am 2005-01-16 20:47:21, schrieb Mathieu Roy: > Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> tapota :
> > This is a protection for innocent $USER. > > I do not allow any Messages comeing from DUL. > > On what basis? Who the hell ever decided that people behind dynamic ip > are not entitled to run an smtp server? You can not check for legitimate sender... No reverse lookup and many things more... > What you call "protection" already harmed "innocent $USER" on some > mailing list run on server I administrated, because we realized to > late that these DUL tests could raison the spam level indicator of > mail high enough to get these mails rejected. Most SPAMs comin from DUL containing only a Link and 3-8 Words. In most castes not enough for spamassassin to get the SPAM. Using DUL with 1.7 get the SPAM. > > ___( '/home/michelle.konzack/.spamassassin/user_prefs' )______________ > > / > > | score RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL 0.1 > > | score RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL 0.1 > > \______________________________________________________________________ > > Sure, the problem at stake here is the fact that the default settings > are so high. Why ? - You are the only one. I know several 100 times more $USER which are penetrated by DUL-SPAM. So it is much easier for you to change the settings as the others. This is an experience. > I talk about freedom to run an smtp server, you talk about your > experience of spamassassin. Off-topic. Your freedom = Accepting SPAM > Huu, you already received two! My messages are sent directly, even if > I'm not behind a dynamic ip. No, I get only the Messages from BTS :-) You do not need to CC me, because I am subscribed to "spamassassin" which I am, beside other packages, monitoring. > Mathieu Roy Greetings Michelle -- Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/ Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886 50, rue de Soultz MSM LinuxMichi 0033/3/88452356 67100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com)
signature.pgp
Description: Digital signature
