Package: libxine1 Version: 1.0-1 Severity: minor
It seems to me that the 1.0 version of xine uses significantly more cpu than any of the release candidates. Something like 10-30% more. I used to be able to run xine over ssh on my server and watch the goom output locally, but I can't with version 1.0 because it takes too much cpu, the video studders. Kind Regards Anders E. Andersen -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10 Locale: LANG=da_DK, LC_CTYPE=da_DK (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages libxine1 depends on: ii libasound2 1.0.7-4 ALSA library ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfreetype6 2.1.7-2.3 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libmodplug0 1:0.7-3 ModPlug mod-like music shared libr ii libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-1 PNG library - runtime ii libspeex1 1.0.rel.4-1 The Speex Speech Codec ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-5 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii xlibs 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4 compression library - runtime -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
