Hi Steve, Today at 1:38, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I don't imagine that a private use glyph is anything we should be overly > worried about release-wise... Provided how simple it is to actually integrate them as well, I see no reason not to. Adobe PUA is guaranteed to be static, and it's not really "private" either. I see no benefit in dropping them, and if you include them, there'll be less chances of multiple conflicting packages around, and people could actually start to build their software expecting to have these alternate glyphs. Of course, them missing should not block the release or be considered critical. Cheers, Danilo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
