Hans baier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > Package: tetex-bin > Version: 2.0.2-25 > Severity: important > > I use the pslatex package to print Linux Seminar courseware. > This is heavily dependent on the correct rendering of backticks. > > The backticks are rendered correctly if viewed in xdvi > or PDF generated by pdflatex, whereas they are > rendered incorrectly when using dvips.
I followed the procedure you gave, and I cannot see a significant difference between the xdvi and gv display. The little difference I see is probably due to different rendering. When I compare the result of latex nfssfont; dvips nfssfont.dvi; gv nfssfont.ps & to pdflatex nfssfont; gv nfssfont.pdf & I see no difference at all. The three files are at http://people.debian.org/~frank/nfssfont.dvi http://people.debian.org/~frank/nfssfont.ps http://people.debian.org/~frank/nfssfont.pdf if you want to have a look. Can you send us an example where the backticks are incorrect? Regards, Frank -- Frank K�ster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Z�rich Debian Developer
