Le Wed, 21 Mar 2012 10:39:06 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez <[email protected]> a écrit :
> On mer., 2012-03-21 at 07:08 +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote: > > > > Shouldn't this go in one of the common-* files rather than each and > > every PAM file. If adding the use of pam_selinux is harmless as you > > described, that shouldn't be a problem, isn't it? > > > > PS: I'm basically ignorant about SELinux and PAM, I just use plain > > logic..:-) > > > > Agreed. > Well actually this is not that easy. The call to the pam module should be done in two phases. You can find more information on: http://selinuxproject.org/page/NB_PAM http://danwalsh.livejournal.com/18865.html Cheers Laurent Bigonville -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
