On 03/22/2012 09:28 PM, jaalto wrote: > On 2012-03-22 21:18, Thomas Goirand wrote: > | > | Thanks a lot for your work. > | > | The patch looks really fine. Please go ahead and upload. However, it'd > | be nice to keep debhelper compat to 8, as there's nothing that the > | package need from debhelper 9, and IMO, it's not helping to promote the > | package to debhelper 9. > > Hi Thomas, > > The reason for debhelper 9 the upcoming Debian Relase where hardened > build flags are a target. With debhelper 9 the transition to > dh(1) style debian/rules and build flags is easier: > > http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/SecurityHardeningBuildFlags
Oh ok, I didn't know. > If you still think that 8 is more appropriate, please confirm and I'll > update accordingly. No, it's ok, please go ahead. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
