reopen 601956 found 601956 2.1.5-3 thanks Hi,
I'd totally forgotten about this bug, to which I should really have offered a response, sorry! You mention in the latest changelog that your local wrapper script was replaced by an upstream one. However, it doesn't look different, and I can't find the script in the upstream source tarball or version control system. So I wonder if you closed the wrong bug, or wrote the wrong summary, or forgot the right wrapper in the last upload? Regarding the wrapper itself, and putting library code in /usr/bin: > Hm i thought this is the standard way to be able to have sourceable > scripts without the need to specify the path. For example gettext-base > ships gettext.sh in /usr/bin which behaves the same: I was not aware that gettext-base did this, but afaik it is also incorrect to do so. I think it might be worth discussing the technique on debian-devel. -- Jon Dowland -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
