On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 09:52:03PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote: > Julian Andres Klode <[email protected]> writes: > > > On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 04:16:22PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote: > >> Package: dh-autoreconf > >> Version: 5 > >> Severity: important > >> File: /usr/bin/dh_autoreconf > >> > >> Today I failed to build a package: > >> > >> /var/tmp/libmediainfo-0.7.52 $ dh_autoreconf > >> autoconf-wrapper: invalid number of arguments > >> dh_autoreconf: autoreconf -f -i Project/GNU/Library returned exit code 255 > >> ed@zombie: /var/tmp/libmediainfo-0.7.52 $ dh_autoreconf -v > >> find Project/GNU/Library ! -ipath "./debian/*" -a ! \( -path '*/.git/*' > >> -o -path '*/.hg/*' -o -path '*/.bzr/*' -o -path '*/.svn/*' -o -path > >> '*/CVS/*' \) -a -type f -exec md5sum {} \; > debian/autoreconf.before > >> autoreconf -f -i Project/GNU/Library > >> autoconf-wrapper: invalid number of arguments > >> > >> Solution: remove autoconf2.13 (which puts a diversion upon autoreconf > >> binary). > > > > It would work with autoconf2.13 if the wrapper was patched to forward > > all non-option arguments (pathes in this case) to autoreconf. I'd > > prefer that solution over a conflict with autoconf2.13, as developers > > may have that installed or packages may want to use it for whatever > > reasons. > > I've made a proposed fixed autoconf2.13 2.13-62 available here: > http://benpfaff.org/~blp/autoconf2.13/ > > If you approve, I will upload it and close this bug.
I did not look closely at it, but according to the changelog this seems fine to me. -- Julian Andres Klode - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member See http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode and http://jak-linux.org/. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
