Ian Jackson wrote:
> Joey Hess writes ("Re: Bug#597050: GNU parallel, name conflict with
> moreutils"):
> > I object to involving the technical committee. There is not a technical
> > disagreeement here; there is a lack of work here.
>
> Ah, I'm sorry, I must have misunderstood your comments in #597050.
> I took them for an objection, rather than a request for help.
>
> In that case you would not object to the upload of GNU parallel with
> /usr/bin/parallel and a Replaces against current moreutils, and to an
> NMU of moreutils to do the transition as I proposed ?That's not the interesting part of the work required for this transition. Managing breakage is. -- see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
