On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:57:10PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 10:05:15PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > Michael Prokop <[email protected]> (03/10/2010): > > > Yes, see #592166: > > > > > > | The new upstream version supports just the given architectures, > > > | that's why I've already requested for removal on other archs which > > > | has been done, see #591105 > > > > Too bad those don't get the buildd.d.o pages updated. I shall try and > > remember to find a solution for those cases. > > > > > What do you recommend for now? > > > > Downgrade FTBFS bugs to important when they are for architectures > > where there are no built binaries. Leaving them open means nobody > > should open them “again” and bother you more. > > Furthermore declaring the set of supported architectures in > debian/control (and hence the .dsc) or adding it to > Packages-arch-specific.
I'm serious, fwiw. Marking it not-for-us for now, but it's annoying. Kind regards Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
