Hi All, > I think a better warning would be something like this: > update-rc.d: warning: default start runlevel arguments (2 3 4 5) do not match > foobar Default-Start values (2 3 5) > update-rc.d: warning: default stop runlevel arguments (0 1 6) do not match > foobar Default-Stop values (0 1) > > > A new patch would look something like: > > --- update-rc.d 2011-02-23 18:40:15.000000000 -0800 > +++ /usr/sbin/update-rc.d 2011-02-24 00:44:43.043783266 -0800 > @@ -480,6 +480,7 @@ > my ($name, $act) = (shift, shift); > my ($lsb_start_ref, $lsb_stop_ref, $arg_str, $lsb_str); > my (@arg_start_lvls, @arg_stop_lvls, @lsb_start_lvls, @lsb_stop_lvls); > + my $default_msg = ($act eq 'defaults') ? 'default' : ''; > > ($lsb_start_ref, $lsb_stop_ref) = > parse_def_start_stop("/etc/init.d/$name"); > @lsb_start_lvls = @$lsb_start_ref; > @@ -523,15 +524,15 @@ > join("\0", sort @arg_start_lvls) ne join("\0", sort > @lsb_start_lvls)) { > $arg_str = @arg_start_lvls ? "@arg_start_lvls" : "none"; > $lsb_str = @lsb_start_lvls ? "@lsb_start_lvls" : "none"; > - warning "$name start runlevel arguments ($arg_str) do not match", > - "LSB Default-Start values ($lsb_str)"; > + warning "$default_msg start runlevel arguments ($arg_str) do not > match", > + "$name Default-Start values ($lsb_str)"; > } > if ($#arg_stop_lvls != $#lsb_stop_lvls or > join("\0", sort @arg_stop_lvls) ne join("\0", sort @lsb_stop_lvls)) { > $arg_str = @arg_stop_lvls ? "@arg_stop_lvls" : "none"; > $lsb_str = @lsb_stop_lvls ? "@lsb_stop_lvls" : "none"; > - warning "$name stop runlevel arguments ($arg_str) do not match", > - "LSB Default-Stop values ($lsb_str)"; > + warning "$default_msg stop runlevel arguments ($arg_str) do not > match", > + "$name Default-Stop values ($lsb_str)"; > } > } > > What do you think?
I agree with the patch, Roger would it possible to include this patch in sysvinit git please? Thanks, Kel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org