This is not a bug in sssd, but in libldap-2.4-2, so should this actually be reassigned to libldap-2.4-2?
I would do that, but the bug is already open there (#666230), so I am not sure
what is the correct procedure. Reassign + merge?
Cheers,
Juha
--
-----------------------------------------------
| Juha Jäykkä, [email protected] |
-----------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
