Package: insserv Version: 1.14.0-3 Severity: minor Hi,
I cringe every time insserv gives a report such as this:
------------------------------------------------------------
insserv: warning: current stop runlevel(s) (0 6) of script `alsa-utils'
overwrites defaults (0 1 6).
------------------------------------------------------------
Shouldn't the word be "overrides"? Even the Debian patch that tweaks
these messages uses "overrides" in the patch description. "overwrites"
just seems plain wrong, and it's in a fairly visible place here,
output very often when upgrading packages...
Sami
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.3.1 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages insserv depends on:
ii libc6 2.13-27
insserv recommends no packages.
Versions of packages insserv suggests:
pn bootchart2 <none>
-- debconf information:
insserv/enable: true
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
