On Sat, 14 Apr 2012 15:05:14 +0200 Luca Capello <[email protected]> wrote: > > #447523: splashy: timeout error due to fsck on big partitions > [...] > > From: Neil Williams <[email protected]> > > Subject: Closing > [...] > > notfound 447523 0.3.5 > > I disagree on this, read below. > > > splashy is no longer in Debian as oldstable has been cleared in preparation > > for the Wheezy freeze. > > The fact that splashy is no longer in Debian (because of #648063) is one > thing, which does not mean that the bug I reported had not been found in > that specific version. > > What is the rationale against simply closing the bug without touching > the reported version?
For the benefit of the bug report, this was done so that the bug can be closed with -done instead of the deprecated / special purpose -close. The found version is still listed in the bug report itself, removing the found status simply allows the bug to be archived. I don't see what purpose the found status field will achieve once the bug is archived as the package does not exist in Debian. -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpwvHzZv8UZd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
