On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 04:13:17PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 04:57:03PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> >
> >However it would be nice if you could avoid breaking all our official
> >buildds in the process next time.  I.e. a notice *before* breaking the
> >ports' users would've been helpful, especially as that change wasn't
> >particularly time critical *for Debian*.
> 
> For now I've put in an extra /lib/ld-linux.so.3 symlink on the buildds
> so they can start working again immediately. Next, I'm scanning all
> the machines to verify exactly which packages need
> fixing/rebuilding/reinstalling. Shouldn't take too long.

To be fair, I had no way of knowing that the Debian buildds were running
binaries from debian-ports (or, more accurately, binaries built against
debian-ports by DSA).  The revelation was somewhat of a shock to me, as
I've had very little (ie: nothing) to do with the Debian armhf buildds.

Apologies for the breakage, but it seems like Steve has things well in
hand by now.

... Adam



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to