Hi, Am Dienstag, den 15.05.2012, 22:22 +0100 schrieb Finn Lawler: > Package: ghc > Version: 7.4.1-3 > Severity: normal > > ghc 7.4.1-3 (unstable) appears to be configured against the ordinary binutils > ld. The ld.gold that binutils-gold 2.22-6 (testing) replaces it with does > not accept the `--hash-size' option, resulting in a fatal error at the > linking stage. > > See also > <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/2011-December/097959.html> and > follow-up.
not sure what we should do here. Should GHC at runtime detect what linker is used, and pass the appropriate flags? Is there a stable path to the GNU ld that can be used no matter whether binutils-gold is installed or not? Is /usr/bin/ld.bfd or /usr/lib/compat-ld/ld the right path to use? Or is it binutils-gold’s responsibility to accept any arguments that GNU ld accepts when it installs itself as /usr/bin/ld? Thanks, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer [email protected] | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: [email protected] | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
