Yes, there is a reason. The name matches the source package, since it also includes debug symbols for binaries (not only libraries).
O. On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Geoffrey Thomas <[email protected]> wrote: > Source: cyrus-sasl2 > Version: 2.1.25.dfsg1-4 > Priority: wishlist > > Hi, > > It looks like cyrus-sasl2-{mit,heimdal}-dbg are the debug symbols for > libsasl2-modules-gssapi-{mit,heimdal}, not cyrus-sasl2-{mit,heimdal} as > their name would imply (in fact those packages got removed a while ago). > This confuses me. Is there a reason not to rename them to > libsasl2-modules-gssapi-{mit,heimdal}-dbg? > > Thanks, > -- > Geoffrey Thomas > [email protected] > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pkg-cyrus-sasl2-debian-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-cyrus-sasl2-debian-devel -- Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
