On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Adrian Knoth <a...@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de> wrote: > On 05/24/2012 11:49 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Hi, especially Vince from dbus-c++! > >> Source: libffado >> Version: 2.0.99+svn2124-1 >> Severity: serious >> Tags: wheezy sid >> User: debian...@lists.debian.org >> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120524 qa-ftbfs >> Justification: FTBFS on amd64 >> >> Hi, >> >> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on >> amd64. > > >>> Checking whether 'which dbusxx-xml2cpp' executes no >>> >>> One of the dbus-headers, the dbus-c++-headers and/or the application >>> 'dbusxx-xml2cpp' where not found. The dbus-server for ffado will >>> therefore not be built. > > > Formerly, dbusxx-xml2cpp has been provided in libdbus-c++-dev, but as of > dbus-c++-0.9.0-3, it's been split into a separate libdbus-c++-bin > package for the sake of multiarch. > > I can now add libdbus-c++-bin to the list of build dependencies in > libffado, however, maybe it makes sense to have libdbus-c++-dev depend > on libdbus-c++-bin for backwards compatibility and due to their close > relation. > > WDYT?
Hi Adrian, Agreed, I'll upload a fixed version of dbus-c++ ASAP. I admit that I neglected to run test re-builds of dbus-c++'s reverse dependencies right after converting it to multiarch, sorry! I'd still encourage you to add libdbus-c++-bin as a build dependency for libffado though; sflphone [1] (AFAIK the only other package that build depends on dbus-c++) has also done so. Regards, Vincent [1] http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/sflphone/news/20120520T031623Z.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org