Hello Timo, On Tuesday 05 June 2012 01:41 PM, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote: > it seems that due to lack of time we are going to release wheezy without > working systemtap-server. I think this is ok since systemtap-server is > entirely optional part of systemtap. > > Ritesh, should we document this somehow in the package itself or is the > bug report enough?
An entry in the NEWS section will be better, mentioning the limitations of the -server package. Checking around I found this: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=8700 Can the reporter test if the addition of the runuser command solves problems? In case it does, we will need to work on its inclusion into coreutils now, for smooth landing in the next release. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com "Necessity is the mother of invention."
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
