On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 11:28:13PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote: > Hmm, are you aware that Xprt *can* already be started by a normal > user. Actually that what the point I was making against your point. You question how enthusiastic some systems would be to have an Xprt instance running for every single user. But there is nothing to prevent it as it is now.
> I think you could turn this into a solution easily enough, or at least a > workaround. I might even dare to close this bug on that basis :) Is there not some document on how a default configuration should behave? I think it is strange to have the default configuration to be this unsecure. I just take any deamon package I have installed in mind and the most insecure deamon I have seen would be mysql (which had an empty root password for the localhost) But that package would at least report itself as insecure and suggest a fix... oh, right you where joking :D Maybe someone of Xprint or X.org can come up with a suggestion? I really think a common usage pattern would be a single host with users which do not thrust eachother. I am really surprised I cannot find a document on how to configure it like that. Regards, Christof -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
