Maybe this bug can be closed, since the man page describes the way to
get both, the user.group and the us.er:group:
"[...] For backwards compatibility, "." may be used instead of ":" to
separate the user and group but since "." may appear in user and group
names, ambiguities can arise such as using --user=u.g with users u and
u.g and group g. With such an ambiguity, daemon will assume the user u
and group g. Use --user=u.g: instead for the other interpretation."
Kind regards
Marcus Blumhagen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
