The changelog entry for 1.4-5 talks about "achitecture-specific font files", but are those .fon files really architecture-specific?
Are those fonts really not used? Is it safe to remove them? A cursory look at the file differences tells me that the tools/sfnt2fnt.c which is used to generate these files clearly has an endianess problem that ought to be fixed and reported upstream. (I was not even aware that those .fon files are supposed to be valid Windows 3.1 executables. WTF?) I also wonder about the value for users in providing libwine packages for powerpc and sparc architectures. If non-x86 architectures were dropped for the moment, the fonts would not even be an issue. Cheers, -Hilko -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
