On 2012-06-15 20:06:20 +0800, [email protected] wrote:
> >>>>> "VL" == Vincent Lefevre <[email protected]> writes:
> VL> Note that '+' and '-' don't have any effect when the zoom value is
> VL> one of the 3 "fit" options (the default depends on your X resources).
> VL> I think that's a feature (because '+' and '-' don't change the
> VL> window size), but it should be improved, IMHO. If this is your
> VL> case, you can see the wishlist bug I've just reported:
>
> VL> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677066
>
> Indeed that seems to be my problem.
>
> Who ever thought to make the + and - keys unresponsive in certain
> circumstances!?!
The main issue is what the user expects when + or - is used in this
case (with fit page/width/height):
* Change the zoom factor, keeping the same window size, but the
document would no longer fit the page/width/height?
* Change both the zoom factor and the window size?
* In the latter case, what if the window wouldn't fit in the screen?
No longer fit? Choose the maximum (if not yet the maximum)?
I suppose that different users would have different expectations.
That's why it should be configurable, but I don't know what the
default should be.
--
Vincent Lefèvre <[email protected]> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
