Hello, On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 21:30:12 -0700 Andrew Pollock <apoll...@debian.org> wrote:
> I may have spoken too soon. There's no noticeable time difference > between a run of dhclient with or without the -1 option (although I'd > have thought we'd want dhclient to hang around in the background in > case a cable was subsequently plugged in, so I still don't think that > adding -1 to how ifup invokes dhclient is a particularly desirable > thing) Well, I don't really know what is worse: to have ifupdown to think it's okay and mark our interface as being up, but not having it really configured (so we have some inconsistency), or to require a user to run ifplugd or something to bring it back up when the link is available again or to run ifup again by hand. Probably I will just implement some kind of callbacks in the next version of ifupdown so we can make it really working. -- WBR, Andrew
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
