On dim., 2012-06-17 at 00:34 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Yves-Alexis Perez <[email protected]> writes: >
> Is it fair then to only include gtk2-engines-xfce? I don't think so. > It should include all > the gtk2-engines or none. And I would say "none". It is the users job > then to install the needed gtk2-engines-* packages for both amd64 and > i386 if at all. Similar to pam modules when being required in amd64 and > i386 or input methods for gtk. We don't have a good way to automatically > force them to be installed for amd64+i386 under multiarch as needed yet. Agreed. > > > I'm not sure if that applies to multiarch though. > > It will apply there too. Multiarch just changes the file locations. It > won't change the basic behaviour of gtk. So while this seems > uninteresting for ia32-libs-gtk itself, I should probably drop the > dependency, it will be of relevance for users. So gtk2-engines-* should > probably all be multiarchified. > > Is there a mailinglist for gtk2-engines-* packages where this could be > discussed with the right audience? > Unfortunately no, I don't think so. I'm directly involved in gtk2-engines-xfce and gtk2-engines-murrine but I don't know for others. Regards, -- Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
