On Thu, 13 Dec 2001, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > On Thu, 13 Dec 2001, Joey Hess wrote: > > While it might be legal to just remove that part of the several copyrights, > > I feel it's best to forward this upstream. Maybe you'll want to forward it > > upstream too.. > > I have no recent information about the status of plans for removal of this > clause in NetBSD (though I am not aware of any current obstacles to its > removal or plans not to do so) and am awaiting its removal there (from > UCB-copyright files; I am aware of no plans to remove it from NetBSD > Foundation copyright files) rather than doing any such removal myself. > When it is removed upstream, I will follow.
Upstream appear to have had sufficient time to follow through with this licensing correction now and are not demonstrating any intention to correct their files; so I propose that Debian proceed to remove clause three from the UCB files rather than continue waiting for the NetBSD calends. J. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
