On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 16:29:42 +0200, Josselin Mouette <[email protected]> wrote: > Le samedi 23 juin 2012 à 16:12 +0200, Eduard Bloch a écrit : > > And then you simply decided to > > amputate this feature completely rather than fix the bugs related to it. > > Seriously? > > > > Looks like an NMU invitation to me. > > If you have time to do NMUs for such bizarre requests, maybe you have > enough time to help fix real bugs in evince? Or maybe enough time to fix > mime-support?
While I may have time to do a trivial NMU to revert a simple patch, I
probably do not have time to fix "real bugs" that I do not suffer from
or do a complete overhaul of the mime-support package.
> Note that normally NMUs are much appreciated, but re-introducing this
> anti-feature will not be. Unless the NMUer is committing to maintain
> this mailcap file at every new upstream release, of course.
(What's an anti-feature? Seems to me this is a reasonable request.)
Maintaining the mailcap file seems to be a reasonable compromise of
course.
A.
--
Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes
hurtling down the highway.
- Andrew S. Tanenbaum, "Computer Networks"
pgpnxEMx7muU9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
