Colin Watson, le Tue 26 Jun 2012 23:44:22 +0100, a écrit : > This is the direct opposite of #676591, changed in 2.3-9.2. Since I can > reproduce this but not the behaviour Samuel reported, I'm going to > revert that part of the NMU patch.
And now -10 built fine on archs where it was tried (i.e. also all, including *i386). How odd. > These functions are conditional on > the "whether the compiler generally respects inline" configure check, so > perhaps something odd was happening there. Probably yes. I'd however say that these symbols should just not appear at all. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
