* Daniel Leidert <daniel.leid...@wgdd.de>, 2012-07-04, 22:19:
python-avogadro is the only package in the archive that depends on
python2.7-qt4. I think it makes more sense to fix it there than in
python-qt4 and depend on a bug in poilcy, but since that's what it
says, I'll fix it in python-qt4 if you prefer.
I would prefer if you re-add the Provides field in python-qt4.
While I'm not a fan of python:Provides, and I agree that python-avogadro
should stop depending on python2.X-foo packages, removing virtual
packages at this point of release cycle is not really reasonable,
specially when reverse-dependencies still exist. Scott, can you add them
back?
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
