On 03.07.2012 10:17, Teodor MICU wrote: >> if [ "$1" = "remove" ] ; then >> pam-auth-update --package --remove systemd >> fi >> >> Can you please verify? > I don't think this is the case. Executing that command manually works just > fine:
[..] > The problem might be that the above script was not executed on > removal? (ie. postrm or something) It is called in prerm, which means it's called on removal. So far this problem is unfortunately not reproducible here. Tollef, the only issue I see is that libpam-systemd is missing a dependency on libpam-runtime (>= 1.0.1-6), which we should add in any case. That said, it is most unlikely though that Teodor did not have libpam-runtime installed when he removed libpam-systemd (as this would have generated a failure due to the missing pam-auth-update). If "pam-auth-update --package --remove systemd" did not trigger a warning about locally modified configuration, I'm a bit at a loss here what could have caused the problem for Teodor. -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
