On Monday, July 09, 2012 04:22:06 PM Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 09/07/12 at 10:02 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > >From looking at various DEHS errors, I agree that the DB is > > >missing/corrupt.> > > I would be willing to work on trying to figure this out if I could have > > access. > Hi, > > Last week I tried to understand what was broken, but failed. So I wrote > my own "upstream status" gatherer for UDD (which is the one used for > http://udd.debian.org/dmd.cgi). If you need the data in some specific > format, I can probably provide an export of it.
Since DEHS has been broken for two months, maybe it's best to migrate using UDD as the database source. I'm personally primarily interested in seeing it correct on the PTS. I don't know if it makes more sense to make DEHS take data from UDD and PTS picks it up from DEHS as it does now or to change PTS to use UDD directly? P.S. If you couldn't figure it out, I'm pretty sure I won't be able to either. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
