On 2012-05-14 15:31, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Samstag, 14. April 2012, Andreas Beckmann wrote: >> This could catch postrm scripts that do too much, affecting other >> packages. Such errors are probably hidden if the deps are purged, too.
> Sounds good. Actually can't this just be the default behaviour by adding I did a few tests (and filed a few bug reports already) and found the following problems that need to be addressed: * the test should be skipped for packages that are part of the base chroot, but not essential/required - purging them fails :-) * needs to handle packags on dependecy cycles - currently install deps(p) installs p, too - removing p removes the depcycle(p), too => there is an unwanted delta in the chroot * we need another list of excludes or some other mechanism to ignore modified logfiles that are owned by deps(p), modified by installing p and only purged by purging deps(p), e.g. fontconfig.log Andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
