Hi, On 07/12/2012 02:19 PM, Vincent Danjean wrote: >> I'm filing this bug as grave as I can't see how latex-make is useable as >> expected anymore. > > This is not really the definition of grave. I switch back to normal > for now.
Well, the definition of grave is that after installing the package is not usable at all, which is indeed the case, unless you install tex related packages after latex-make. AS I don';t want to play severity ping-pong I just assume you are going to fix the issue :) [..] > Can you: > 1) save /usr/share/texmf/ls-R > 2) report the result of "kpsewhich --format texmfscripts latexfilter.py" > (should be empty) > 3) run as root "texhash" > 4) report the result of "kpsewhich --format texmfscripts latexfilter.py" > (should be /usr/share/texmf/scripts/latex-make/latexfilter.py ) > 5) compare /usr/share/texmf/ls-R and the saved version (in 1) > > If the cause of the bug is a wrong /usr/share/texmf/ls-R as I suspect, > we must found why. indeed, latex-make was missing in ls-R. What latex-make's debian/rules is missing is a call to dh_installtex from tex-common which ensures the tex triggers are being run after installing the packages. Patch is attached, please ensure it goes into Wheeze. Thanks, Bernd -- Bernd Zeimetz Debian GNU/Linux Developer http://bzed.de http://www.debian.org GPG Fingerprint: ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F
diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules index e98041e..36a177c 100755 --- a/debian/rules +++ b/debian/rules @@ -9,4 +9,4 @@ override_dh_auto_install: override_dh_install: dh_install --fail-missing - + dh_installtex
