reassign 314622 aspell-nl close 314622 1:0.1e-38 merge 314622 329181 thanks
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 04:49:08PM +0200, Agustin Martin wrote: > On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 12:30:16PM +0200, Pascal A. Dupuis wrote: > > To get aspell-nl properly registred, I did the following: > > > > 1) extract the file idutch from package idutch, found under > > /var/lib/dictionaries-common/ispell > > 2) copied it as /var/lib/dictionnaries-common/aspell/aspell-nl > > 3) ran /usr/sbin/update-dictcommon-aspell > > > > So, what's missing: > > - the proper dictionnary definition aspell-nl > > - postinst and postrm scripts which update the aspell dict list > > > > Thanks for taking a look at this. > > You are right in the steps, but is better to add this in aspell-nl package > directly. dutch dicts are currently orphaned, > > http://bugs.debian.org/314839 > > I already mailed the two interested persons about patches I had nearly > ready for dutch dicts, one will deal only with registration and the other > will also deal with affix compression (available for aspell 0.60). This > second revealed some possible inconsistencies in the wordlist that might be > of interest upstream. I am cc'ing these two persons now. > > I will reassign this bugreport to aspell-nl as soon as it has a new > maintainer, I do not want to put noise on QA people in the meantime. If > nodoby finally takes the package I will take it temporarily until finds a > better (dutch speaking) home. The companion bug report [#329181: aspell-nl: fails to interface properly to emacs] has been closed by a QA upload, so I am reassigning this bug report to aspell-nl, closing it as of aspell-nl 1:0.1e-38 and merging it with #329181. Thanks for your feedback. [QA team, nothing else is required on your side] Cheers, -- Agustin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
