On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 12:28:38AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Hm. Does upstream have any hints about this? My first guess would > be that the imported copy of procps was distro-patched.
It looks like it. procps 3.2.8 came out in 2009. The Debian, Fedora and OpenSuSE fork of procps, which is what Debian uses, has undergone a lot of work and we are in the process of adjusting the library API so it is a much more sane iterface. It looks like ulatencyd ripped out code from procps library and then adjusted to suit. I don't think there is much we can help here unless there were plans to link to a future libprocps. The non-standard UTS message in libproc comes from this sscanf failing Linux version %d.%d.%d and you had: 3.4-trunk-486 and that's not number.number.number - Craig -- Craig Small VK2XLZ http://enc.com.au/ csmall at : enc.com.au Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/ csmall at : debian.org GPG fingerprint: 5D2F B320 B825 D939 04D2 0519 3938 F96B DF50 FEA5 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
