On Monday, July 23, 2012 13:26:57, Don Armstrong wrote: > On Mon, 23 Jul 2012, Chris Knadle wrote: > > On Monday, July 23, 2012 10:34:28, Ian Jackson wrote: > > > Of these 2. would seem to be the best option. > > > > I agree. > > [...] > > I believe in order to actually evaluate any of these solutions, > someone is going to have to prepare binaries, and do an table showing > the tested (not theoretical) compatibility of with multiple different > clients (and servers?) to their solution's server and client. > > I propose that whoever wants to see a particular solution actually sit > down and do the work for their particular solution, with sources, > binaries, interdiffs, and compatibility table conveniently available in > some public location.
That sounds reasonable. I might need occasional advice but otherwise I think I can handle this. -- Chris -- Chris Knadle chris.kna...@coredump.us -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
