* Steve Langasek [Wed Jul 25, 2012 at 08:18:54PM -0700]: > On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 01:38:23PM +0200, Michael Prokop wrote:
> > is there any specific reason why mountall has a dependency on > > plymouth instead of having the package listed under Suggests/Recommends? > Because plymouth is the only way that mountall communicates with the user. Ok > > Neither from the package description nor the manpage I can see a > > reason why it should depend on plymouth (being a graphical boot > > animation and logger). > That's not what plymouth is. Plymouth is a boot-time I/O multiplexer which > happens to have some graphical frontends. I see, thanks for the clarification and sorry for the noise. :) regards, -mika-
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
